Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
A no-code platform for designing and deploying Layer-1 blockchain networks, public or private.
Grounded in available product and source data
Writing smart contracts by hand is the barrier this no-code blockchain platform is built to remove: the site states application logic, data structures, access controls, and deployment settings can all be defined visually, without a single line of code, through what it calls Cerulea Studio.
Three components make up the stated architecture. Studio is the visual design environment where data models and governance rules get built. Cerulea AI sits inside Studio to validate those architectural decisions and check for structural issues before deployment, rather than only after something breaks in production. A separate Dashboard then handles operations — network telemetry, cryptographic key management, and live governance actions once a network is running.
Deployment targets split into two paths: a public Layer-1 network for dApps that need shared, immutable state, and private permissioned chains for organizations that want to control node hosting and participant access themselves. The site frames this as covering use cases from individual dApp builders through SMEs, enterprise, and government, with WASM and EVM compatibility and a stated one-click deployment step connecting the visual design to a live network.
The site does not name specific organizations or networks currently running on Cerulea, doesn't state what happens if a visually-designed contract has a logic error that Cerulea AI's validation misses, and doesn't detail who is liable for a fault in a deployed private chain versus the public one. For blockchain infrastructure carrying real value or access control, verify current security audit status, uptime history, and support terms directly before deploying anything beyond a test network — availability, security posture, and terms can change, and none of the figures here are financial or investment advice.
No, according to the site — the entire design step happens in Studio's visual interface. What the FAQ page doesn't cover is what happens for edge cases a visual builder can't express; anyone with unusual logic requirements should check whether Studio supports it before committing to the no-code approach for that specific use case.
According to the site, the public Cerulea L1 offers shared, immutable state for dApps, while private chains are permissioned networks where an organization controls node hosting, governance, and who can participate — the choice depends on whether shared public state or full organizational control matters more for a given use case.
The site states it validates architectural decisions, enforces security policies, and ensures structural integrity prior to deployment, but doesn't detail what categories of errors it catches or what happens if a logic flaw makes it through validation regardless.
Both, based on the site's stated use cases, which span dApp builders and SMEs alongside enterprise and government — though it doesn't specify whether pricing or support differs meaningfully between an individual building one dApp and an enterprise running a private chain.
