Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
A self-hosted toolchain that runs multiple open-source security scanners together and de-duplicates the results.
Grounded in available product and source data
Wiring together separate open-source security scanners — one for dependencies, another for secrets, another for infrastructure-as-code — and then reconciling three different finding formats is the setup work Betterscan positions itself to remove: the site states it researches, configures, and runs what it calls "all the best Open Source Tools" together, then unifies and de-duplicates the combined results into one output.
On top of that aggregated open-source layer, the site states it adds its own proprietary checkers, meaning the tool isn't purely a wrapper — it contributes its own detection logic alongside whatever scanners it's running underneath. The product is described as self-hosted and built for continuous security, which points at running as ongoing infrastructure inside a team's own environment rather than a hosted SaaS scan-on-demand service.
What the site does not say is just as relevant to evaluating it: it doesn't name which specific open-source scanners are included, so a team can't confirm upfront whether their particular language, package manager, or cloud provider is actually covered. It also doesn't explain the de-duplication mechanism — whether overlapping findings from different tools are matched by file-and-line, by vulnerability ID, or some other method — and doesn't describe the self-hosted deployment model or how it plugs into a CI/CD pipeline. Anyone evaluating Betterscan for a specific stack should confirm scanner coverage and deployment requirements directly before committing, since none of that is stated on the page itself.
The site doesn't name specific tools — it describes aggregating "all the best Open Source Tools" generically, so anyone who needs a specific scanner (for a particular language, dependency manager, or cloud provider) should confirm coverage directly before adopting it.
The site states results are unified and de-duplicated but doesn't explain the matching mechanism — whether findings are correlated by file location, vulnerability identifier, or another method isn't specified on the page.
It's self-hosted, according to the site, meaning it runs inside a team's own environment rather than being operated as an external SaaS scanning service — though the specific deployment method (containerized, VM-based, etc.) isn't detailed.
Both — the site states it adds its own proprietary checkers alongside the open-source tools it aggregates, so coverage isn't limited strictly to what those underlying tools already catch on their own.
