Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Outpaint's UGC-to-CTV tool expands vertical social ads into 16:9 CTV format, no reshoot needed.
Grounded in available product and source data
Turning vertical ads into CTV format usually means a reshoot, a new crew, and a new production cycle — Outpaint's UGC-to-CTV product is built to skip all three, using AI video outpainting to expand vertical user-generated content and social ads into 16:9 CTV-ready spots.
The technical distinction that matters here is what outpainting actually does: it generates new content beyond the original frame's boundaries rather than stretching, cropping, or padding the existing footage, which stays pixel-perfect and untouched throughout the process. A client submits a finished ad or raw clip, specifies the target aspect ratio, and gets back an expanded cut — with output formats covering 16:9, 1:1, vertical, square, ultrawide, and custom ratios depending on where the ad needs to run.
That matters because a pillarboxed or blurred-background version of the same vertical footage is the usual fallback, and the site backs its outpainting approach with a specific comparison: outpainted versions held viewer attention 73% of the time in testing, versus 57% for pillarbox and 66% for blurred-background treatments of the same content — a real gap in a format where the first few seconds decide whether a viewer keeps watching.
Distribution names ten specific CTV and OTT destinations — Roku, Netflix, Hulu, Max, Tubi, Apple TV, Samsung TV Plus, Pluto TV, YouTube, and Amazon Prime Video — plus linear TV, FAST channels, programmatic buys, OLV, and paid social feeds, so one expanded asset can serve multiple channels rather than needing a separate cut per platform. Turnaround is stated in days rather than weeks, and pricing runs per-second, scaled by resolution, frame rate, and aspect ratio, with a custom quote following footage submission rather than a published rate card — worth requesting directly since no fixed tiers or figures are shown on the page reviewed. The page reviewed also does not specify a minimum footage length or resolution requirement for a submission to qualify, so that's worth confirming before sending over lower-quality source clips.
No — the site states original footage remains pixel-perfect and untouched, with all AI generation happening only in the newly expanded area outside the original frame boundaries.
It generates real new content around the footage instead of padding the frame with empty space or a blur, and the site cites testing showing that difference matters for viewer attention: 73% for outpainted versions versus 57% for pillarbox and 66% for blurred-background treatments of the same clip.
Not necessarily — one expanded 16:9 asset is built to serve across the named CTV and OTT destinations plus linear TV and FAST channels, rather than requiring a distinct edit per individual platform.
Deliverables are produced in days per the site, positioned specifically as an alternative to the weeks a full reshoot and production cycle would normally take.
No — the page reviewed doesn't show a rate card, so anyone budgeting for a campaign should request a quote based on their actual footage specs rather than estimating from a generic list.
These 10 comments were collected from the discovery source. ProductVisit does not host replies in Release A.
Today, you can only shoot video for one screen at a time. Go landscape and it won't fit a phone. Go vertical and it looks awful on a laptop. And without a super specialized lens, forget about the big screen. We've all seen the black bars you slap around a video to force it into a new aspect ratio. I hate them with a passion. My favorite movie, Lord of the Rings, was shot in 2.39:1. It doesn't fit a single TV out there. So we're on a mission to end black bars for good. Every video should fit every screen. Today we're launching Ad Reframe, which turns winning vertical UGC ads into CTV ready placements. Our case studies show outpainting far outperforms black bars and side blur. Send us a video you want reframed and we'll send back a free sample so you can see it for yourself. We'd love to hear what you think.
2 source upvotesCurious how Ad Reframe handles the jump from typical UGC formats into TV-ready creative. Since the tagline is “Convert UGC ads for TV,” are you mainly focused on aspect ratio, pacing, and framing, or does it also help with things like voiceover, captions, safe zones, and length requirements for TV spots? That distinction would be helpful for marketers comparing it with a normal video editor.
2 source upvotesSo cool idea man but you didn’t included any demo video for it :)
1 source upvotesCTV ad spend is growing fast and pillarboxing is genuinely embarrassing to watch on a 65" screen - so this solves a real pain. The key question for me is how the AI handles the expanded areas when there's motion near the edge of the original frame. Static backgrounds are easy; someone walking across frame is where things get tricky. Any samples with fast-moving footage?
1 source upvotes@divvsaxena Just added one take a look!
Hey @mia_qiao, we're focused on expanding the aspect ratio by generating new content to fill the extra space. It works best for repurposing your winning ads for bigger screens like YouTube, YouTube TV, Netflix, etc. As for a normal video editor, the process is very simple: send us a video link and get back an expanded ad in a few days.
Checkout this example@galdayan https://youtu.be/vQrPm45AM-Y Here we expand standard rectilinear 2.39:1 video into IMAX full frame 1.43:1. Lots of fast motion and shaky cam!
reframing 9:16 to 16:9 without pillarboxing is the part everyone fakes with blur. do the generated edges stay temporally stable across frames, or can they shimmer?
it's nice to see this product reach todays rank#9. We run UGC campaigns and the 9:16 to 16:9 problem comes up constantly whenever we want to extend to CTV or YouTube pre-rolls. The pillarbox blur workaround genuinely looks bad. The real test for us would be fast motion and shaky handheld footage — that's where outpainting usually falls apart. Curious if there's a confidence score on the output so you know which clips need a manual check before the campaign goes live.
The "generating new content to fill the extra space" bit is the part I'd worry about most. From my own YouTube edits, added background often pulls the eye away from the actual subject. On winning vertical UGC where attention's locked on someone mid-CTA, does the outpainted area stay quiet enough not to steal the read, or do you see it nudging eyes outward?