Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Turns notes or a document into a narrative arc, talking points, and a ready-to-share LinkedIn post.
Grounded in available product and source data
A status update and a story that actually moves a room are different things, and this AI storytelling tool for meetings is built around that gap: paste notes, upload a document, or answer a few questions, and it reads the situation to recommend a matching narrative structure rather than filling in a fixed template.
Five named arcs sit behind that recommendation — Burning Platform for urgency, The Pivot for a course correction, The Comeback, The Breakthrough, and The Champion's Journey — each suited to a different kind of situation rather than one generic pitch structure applied everywhere. Once an arc is chosen, the output goes beyond a script: talking points, points of tension to address directly, prompts to stay ahead of likely questions in the room, and a ready-to-share LinkedIn post if the story is meant to travel beyond the meeting itself.
The site cites a Stanford figure that only 5% of information is retained without a story attached, framing the underlying premise for why structure matters more than content alone in a pitch or update. Access starts free, with an upgrade path to unlimited narratives for individual use, and a separate team tier adding seat management and custom onboarding for organizations bringing it to a group.
What the site doesn't detail is how the AI's recommended arc is validated against a real presentation's actual outcome, or what happens if none of the five arcs fits a genuinely unusual situation. Anyone using it for a high-stakes pitch should still sanity-check the recommended narrative against their own judgment of the room, rather than treating the arc as a given.
No — the site is specific that it reads the user's situation and recommends the narrative structure that fits from five named arcs, rather than applying one fixed template regardless of context.
The site doesn't frame it that way directly — the output is closer to preparation material (talking points, tension points, and questions to expect) than a slide deck itself, so it likely complements a deck rather than replacing one, though this isn't stated explicitly.
The site states the Team plan adds seat management and custom onboarding on top of what's in Individual, with team pricing based on needs and seat count rather than a flat rate — details worth confirming directly for a specific team size.
The input side is designed to be low-friction — the site states notes can be pasted, a document uploaded, or a few questions answered — but the output still depends on what's provided, so a thin starting point will likely produce a thinner narrative.
