Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Sigilix builds AI code review tools that ship evidence for every judgment call, not just confidence.
Grounded in available product and source data
An AI review tool that just says 'looks good' isn't actually useful once something goes wrong — Sigilix is AI code review that ships evidence instead, framed on its own site as evidence over confidence for every judgment it makes about a codebase.
Review is one of four connected surfaces rather than a single tool: Triage grounds vague issues into specific owners and repair paths, Assistant answers and hands things off from inside Slack directly, and a CLI brings the same repair and review help into the terminal for anyone who doesn't want to leave it, alongside a browser-based Chat for connected research questions.
Underneath those surfaces sits Sigilix's own model line rather than a single general-purpose model: Boreas for fast, codebase-aware review and triage; Pyroeis as the base route for grounded answers and small repairs; Astraeus for repository-scale reasoning on higher-risk changes; and Phanes, described as the private path for guardrails and memory integrity — what has to hold before a stronger model ships at all.
Sigilix backs its own claims with public infrastructure rather than asking for trust on faith: published Benchmarks show review accuracy against peer ranges, a Trust Center covers security and reliability, and a Status page tracks uptime and incident history directly. A free trial is available to try the review and triage surfaces before committing.
Different models by task — Boreas handles fast, codebase-aware review and triage, Pyroeis covers grounded answers and small repairs, and Astraeus is reserved for repository-scale reasoning on higher-risk changes, rather than routing every request through one model.
There's a public page for that specifically — Benchmarks shows review accuracy against peer ranges, rather than asking a team to trust an unverifiable internal number.
Yes — Assistant is built Slack-native for answers, reviews, and handoffs, and a separate CLI brings the same repair and review help directly into the terminal, so it isn't limited to a standalone web dashboard.
The site's framing suggests it's treated as a gate rather than a feature — Phanes exists specifically to define what must hold true before a stronger model is allowed to ship, which is a different job from answering a user's actual review or triage request.
Yes — a public Status page tracks availability and incident history directly, rather than requiring a support ticket to find out if something's down.
