Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Intel Desk tracks geopolitical signals across 198 sources, requiring two-source confirmation.
Grounded in available product and source data
One unconfirmed report can move a market on nothing but noise — Intel Desk exists to filter that out, delivering geopolitical signals for energy and macro traders under a hard rule applied before anything counts as confirmed: a two-source minimum, enforced directly through Live Wire's real-time, actionability-ranked alerts.
That discipline runs through the whole platform via what the site calls the Proof System — NATO Admiralty-style source tiering from A down to D, corroboration and contradiction tracking, and a requirement that a claim have a timestamp, independent confirmation, and market-observation agreement before it gets published at all, with a reviewable receipt trail behind every alert. Replay Archive extends that same rigor backward, reconstructing historical case files showing exactly what hit first, what got confirmed, and what quietly faded without holding up.
Market Tape ties intelligence directly to price action — live quotes for Brent, WTI, gold, and defense equities, cross-validated across sources with anything showing more than a 5% discrepancy flagged rather than trusted blindly. Map Operations goes further into physical tracking, using AIS vessel data across strategic corridors like Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb, with 41 separate pressure indicators tracked for the Hormuz corridor specifically, plus OFAC sanctions-list screening built directly in.
Coverage spans 198 curated sources refreshed every 120 seconds, from wire agencies and official government sources at the top tier down to monitored low-reliability sources that the site states never drive an alert alone. Access splits into a Free Early Access tier with full desk access, and a Desk Plan that activates once Early Access ends, adding synced devices and scheduled briefings. Worth being direct about, per the site's own FAQ: this is explicitly not regulated investment guidance or financial advice, and it's a single-operator project where the site itself acknowledges APIs can fail and sources can go stale — a real limitation worth weighing against how much a trading decision leans on it.
No — a two-source minimum is enforced before any signal gets flagged with confidence, specifically to filter out the kind of single-source noise that can move markets on bad information.
No — the site states explicitly, per its own FAQ, that it is not regulated investment guidance and not financial advice, positioning itself as an intelligence and monitoring layer rather than a source of trade recommendations.
Through AIS-based vessel tracking across corridors like Hormuz, Bosphorus, and Bab el-Mandeb, combined with corridor pressure indexing built from traffic volume, AIS gaps, and news intensity — 41 separate indicators are tracked for Hormuz specifically.
No — the site states directly it's purpose-built for conflict-driven energy and defense tracking with proof pages and mobile critical mode, not a general-purpose terminal covering every asset class.
The site is upfront that this can happen — it's a single-operator early-access project where APIs can fail and sources can go stale, with a status page tracking current system health as a stated limitation rather than a hidden risk.
