Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Annotate feedback directly on live websites, videos, PDFs, and more — no client signup required.
Grounded in available product and source data
A client asking for changes over email usually means screenshots, vague line references, and a thread that loses track of what got fixed. BugSmash's answer is to let the comment attach directly to the thing being reviewed — a pin on a live website, a timestamp on a video frame, a marked-up region of a PDF page or a 3D model — so the context travels with the note instead of getting retyped into a chat.
The review side doesn't require an account: a shared link lets a client or guest drop comments without signing up, and each comment can carry a status, a reply thread, and an assignment. Version Comparison puts two rounds of a design side by side, and a browser extension extends the same annotation flow to any live site rather than only uploaded files. Voice notes get transcribed automatically for anyone who'd rather talk through feedback than type it.
A newer layer runs review before a human ever opens the file: Custom AI Reviewers can be trained on a team's brand guidelines and checklists to flag issues first, and a separate AI pass checks accessibility contrast, tap targets, and alt text, plus a UI/UX review. The site lists a copy-and-spell-check tool in the same set but marks spell check itself as still coming, meaning that specific check isn't live yet even though it's advertised alongside the shipped tools.
For teams already living in Slack, Jira, Linear, or similar, BugSmash states it connects to those directly plus a longer tail of apps through Zapier, Make, and n8n, so a resolved comment doesn't have to be manually copied into a ticket. What the page doesn't publish is any breakdown of what separates its access tiers — a testimonial references upgrading to a numbered tier, but seat counts, storage limits, or which features are gated behind which tier aren't stated anywhere on the page, so anyone comparing plans for a specific team size should check directly before committing.
No — the site states feedback can be collected through a shareable link that guests and clients can comment on without signing up, which is positioned specifically to remove friction from client approval rounds.
The site lists live websites, videos, PDFs, images, audio, mobile apps, 3D models, slide decks, and email campaigns as supported formats, with a browser extension specifically for annotating live sites rather than only uploaded files.
According to the site, they're AI personas trained on a team's own brand guidelines, tone, and checklists, positioned to review an asset before a human does — though the page doesn't detail how accurate or configurable that review is beyond the examples shown.
The page doesn't publish specific figures; it sells access as a lifetime purchase spread across multiple numbered tiers, and testimonials reference upgrading between tiers, but per-tier feature or seat limits aren't stated on the page — worth confirming directly before choosing a tier.
Yes, the site states direct integrations with Slack, Jira, ClickUp, Asana, Monday, Trello, and Linear, and adds broader connectivity through Zapier, Make, n8n, and Webhooks for other tools.
