Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
BlockscopeChat is an AI investigator that traces on-chain fund flows and publishes the full trail.
Grounded in available product and source data
Tracing where stolen crypto funds actually ended up usually means hours of manual digging through a block explorer, one transaction at a time — BlockscopeChat offers AI on-chain investigation and wallet tracing instead, decoding transactions and mapping fund flow across a stated 8 blockchains from a single query.
The kinds of questions it's built to answer are specific and investigative rather than generic price-lookup queries: tracing stolen funds from a named exploit, profiling a wallet's counterparties, decoding a flash loan attack transaction, checking whether a token contract behaves like a honeypot, or mapping whether a group of wallets coordinated a coin 'rug.' Each of these normally requires stitching together data across multiple explorers and tools by hand.
What sets published output apart from a typical AI answer is transparency about how it was produced — every tool call involved in a published investigation is included rather than hidden, so another analyst can verify the trail step by step rather than taking the conclusion on faith. A Community section surfaces investigations other users have published this way, browsable by chain.
The site is explicit that research and reports are AI-generated and states this is not financial advice, specifically instructing that addresses, transactions, and findings should be independently double-checked before anyone acts on them. The page reviewed does not specify how frequently new chains are added to the supported list, worth confirming directly for an investigation involving a chain not named among the current 8.
It could be — since the investigation includes every tool call, a wrong step is at least visible for review, but the site's own guidance is to independently double-check any address or transaction before acting on it.
Published investigations include every tool call involved, specifically so another analyst can retrace the steps rather than accepting the conclusion without visibility into how it was produced.
It covers a stated 8 chains, including Ethereum, Polygon, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, Fantom, and BNB Chain, not Ethereum alone.
That's one of the named example queries — checking whether a token contract behaves like a honeypot — though any such finding should still be treated as a starting point for further verification, not a final answer.
