Get the weekly radar
One short email with the freshest products, every week.
Acta records meetings across Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams, then turns them into summaries, action points, and role-specific outputs.
Grounded in available product and source data
A meeting that produces a page of scattered notes and no clear owner for what happens next is the specific failure Acta is built to prevent — the site states it connects to Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams (also via a Chrome extension covering the same three platforms) to record and process a conversation into structured output rather than a raw transcript alone.
Each processed meeting yields an Executive Summary, Key Topics, Action Points, Decisions, Takeaways, a full transcript, and a sentiment read on the conversation. An 'Ask Acta' feature goes further than static output — a user can query the meeting directly, checking whether a deal closed, what a specific person committed to, or whether a candidate should move to the next interview stage, rather than re-reading a transcript to find that answer manually. The site frames this as role-specific: outputs are described as convertible into things like PRDs, JIRA tickets, deal briefs, or candidate assessments depending on the team using it.
Three tiers separate mainly by scale and compliance rather than core features alone. Free includes 600 minutes of storage with limited AI summarization; Pro removes the storage and summary caps and adds talk-time analytics, a follow-up centre for tracking action points, and unlimited integrations; Enterprise adds on-premise deployment, white-label options, SSO, and stated SOC1 TYPE2 and HIPAA compliance for organizations with stricter data requirements. The site states Acta increases productivity by 40% through automating documentation and follow-ups, though it doesn't publish the methodology or sample size behind that figure, so it's worth treating as a general claim rather than a specific outcome any team should expect.
On security, the site states meeting data is protected with 256-bit AES and SSL/TLS encryption, and a dedicated FAQ section addresses compliance questions — GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, whether meeting content is used to train AI models, and data retention — but the actual answers to those questions weren't visible in the page content reviewed here. Anyone evaluating Acta for meetings involving sensitive business, legal, or personal information should read those compliance answers directly rather than assume a specific policy from the tier names alone.
The site states calendar integration with Google and Microsoft Teams calendars, which implies scheduled meetings can be joined automatically once connected, rather than requiring a manual join or upload for every single call — though the exact automatic-join mechanics per platform aren't detailed on the page.
Yes — the Ask Acta feature is described as letting a user query the meeting directly, with the site's own examples including checking whether a deal was finalized or reviewing what a specific attendee contributed, rather than only producing a static summary.
The Enterprise tier states HIPAA compliance and SOC1 TYPE2 among its features, but the detailed answers to the site's own compliance FAQ (covering GDPR, SOC 2, and whether meeting data trains AI models) weren't visible in the page content reviewed — worth reading those answers directly before using Acta for regulated conversations.
The Pro tier is described as collaboration for teams or companies, billed per seat, which implies shared access across a team, but the page doesn't specify the exact permission model — whether every member sees every meeting by default or access is scoped some other way.
The site lists a broad range of meeting types beyond sales — including user interviews, team syncs, performance reviews, board meetings, one-on-ones, daily standups, and project meetings — each framed around a different kind of follow-up the notes are meant to support.
